Springfield, MO 417-222-4878
Joplin, MO 417-222-4878

Malpractice liability for untimely death of terminal patient?

In any medical malpractice case, there are four general elements that must
be proven. These are: duty; breach; causation; and harm. While public
discussion of medical malpractice tends to focus a lot on the elements
of duty and breach, causation is a very important aspect of any medical
malpractice case.

Proving that a physician breached a recognized standard of care and that
the patient suffered harm is not enough in
medical malpractice litigation. It must also be proven that there is a sufficient connection between
the physician’s breach and the harm suffered by the patient. This
sufficient connection is otherwise known as “proximate cause.”

The issue of causation is a central one in a medical malpractice case currently
up on appeal before the Missouri Supreme Court. In that case, a physician
is being sued for malpractice on the allegation that the physician’s
negligence caused a terminal patient to die sooner than he otherwise would
have. In this case, the deceased patient had an aggressive form of brain
cancer that the patient’s doctor failed to detect.

The deceased man’s family argues that he would have lived a number
of months longer if the doctor had properly detected the cancer, and that
his failure to do so therefore amounted to an acceleration of death, even
though that death was inevitable. On the defendant side, the argument
is that the physician’s failure to detect cancer did not cause the
man’s death, since he would have died anyway. The defendant says
the proper test in this case is the “but for” test. In other
words, the physician argues that the proper question is whether the patient
would have died, but for the physician’s negligence.

In our next post, we’ll continue looking at this issue and the importance
of building a strong medical malpractice case around the issue of causation.

Source: Hannibal Courier-Post, “Mo. Supreme Court to hear Hannibal wrongful death case,” Eric Dundon, Oct. 20, 2015.

Medical Malpractice

Is medical malpractice litigation a viable option for me? P.3

We’ve been speaking in our last couple posts on the issue of when medical malpractice may or may not be a viable option when a patient is harmed by a doctor in the course of treatment. As we’ve noted, there are a variety of factors that go into determining whether medical malpractice litigation is a wise course of action. We’ve also spoken a bit about some of the factors relating

Car Accidents

Older drivers: Safer than ever before

The Baby Boom generation has been America\’s largest generation in history. But as its members began to gray and approach retirement, safety researchers worried that aging Boomers would increase the number of car accidents on our nation\’s highways. But older Joplin drivers should be reassured: today\’s drivers age 70 or above are less likely to be in traffic accidents than previous generations. More good news: today\’s older drivers are less

Articles

Suing on Behalf of a Family Member

Can I sue on behalf of a family member? If a family member can’t represent themselves, you may be able to help. But before we can work together to get the justice you all deserve, it’s important to answer the following questions: What is required to file on someone’s behalf? Mental or Physical Impairment Your family member cannot make decisions for themselves Wrongful Death Your family member has died in

Contact Us.

    Submitting the form is not necessarily establishing an attorney-client relationship